DISCLOSURE: THIS POST MAY CONTAIN AFFILIATE LINKS,MEANING That I GET A COMMISSION IF YOU DECIDE TO MAKE A PURCHASE THROUGH MY LINKS, AT NO COST TO YOU. PLEASE READ FULL DISCLOSURE HERE
So, is Jim Cramer’s CNBC Investing Club subscription worth it?
What are you really getting from joining Jim Cramer’s CNBC Investing Club?
Can you achieve market-beating returns by following the stock picks inside Jim Cramer’s CNBC Investing Club?
Are there any better stock-picking services than Jim Cramer’s CNBC Investing Club?
Jim Cramer’s CNBC Investing Club Portfolio
So, what is Jim Cramer’s CNBC Investing Club?
And what can you actually get from it?
CNBC Investing Club is Jim Cramer’s members-only investing club, providing real-time trade alerts and investment advice from Jim Cramer and his research team.
As a member, you have access to Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio where you can see every move Jim Cramer and his team make for the portfolio and get their market insight.
Also, through newsletters, articles, and live calls, Jim and his team break down recent purchases, discuss investments they got right, and explain lessons learned from what went wrong.
A bit of back story first.
Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio was created in August 2005 with a stated mandate to donate any resulting dividends and distributions to nonprofit organizations.
Before 2022, you could gain access to Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio by joining Action Alert Plus which was marketed and sold by TheStreet.
Around late 2021, Jim Cramer left TheStreet and is no longer associated with Action Alert Plus.
In Jan 2022, he launched CNBC Investing Club in partnership with CNBC.
Now, let’s take a closer look at what exactly you are getting from CNBC Investing Club.
As a member, you get full access to Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio.
The number of stocks in the portfolio fluctuates over time.
But generally, there would be about 30 stocks in the portfolio.
On top of that, you get a real-time notification on every buy or sell trade that Jim Cramer and his team are about to make, together with their trading analysis.
Also, you will receive a trade alert before Jim Cramer makes a trade.
Jim Cramer waits 45 minutes after sending a trade alert before buying or selling stock in his charitable trust’s portfolio.
If Jim Cramer has talked about a stock on CNBC TV, he waits 72 hours after issuing the trade alert before executing the trade.
So, what is the current holding of Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio?
I am not legally allowed to disclose the current holding of the portfolio, but you can actually find out what stocks are in his charitable trust portfolio from publicly available information.
For example, at the end of this CNBC article dated April 2024, you can find a disclaimer that states that “Nvidia and Eli Lily”.
So, basically, Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio is made up of tech names like Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, and Alphabet, software firms like Nvidia and Salesforce, and defensive plays such as Costco.
What about the entire Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio holdings?
To give you a glimpse of what it is like, you can see the full list of Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio holdings on this CNBC webpage as of Jan 2022.
As you can see, there are also healthcare stocks such as Abbott Laboratories and Eli Lilly and financial stocks such as Wells Fargo in the portfolio as well.
So, you could say that it is a pretty diversified portfolio.
Inside the portfolio, the stocks will be given a rating:
- “1” means stocks that they would buy right now
- “2” means stocks that they would add on a pullback
- “3” means stocks that they would sell on strength
- “4” means stocks that they want to unload
Also, there are some stocks that are so-called “Core Holding”.
These “Core Holding” are companies that Cramer thinks should be held for the long term because, on a financial level, they have high returns on equity, strong margins, and low debt.
However, based on the historical trades of Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio, you can see that there are also frequent buy and sell activities on these so-called “Core Holdings”.
For one particular “Core Holding” stock, I saw that some shares were bought in Oct 2019 and were sold just a few months later.
For the portfolio as a whole, they are constantly analyzing their holdings (technically and fundamentally) on a daily basis and take action as they deem necessary—take a little off the table, add to positions, and trim losers.
For example in Dec 2022, they trimmed their position in P&G (a stock that they still like and believe in) because the stock just had a two-month rally.
As you can see, there were trading alerts almost every day.
Jim Cramer also likes to use a technical indicator called “S&P Short-Range Oscillator” to help determine whether the market is overbought or oversold.
If the indicator is oversold, he would likely buy stocks.
And if the indicator is overbought, he would likely sell stocks.
The problem with this type of technical indicator is that it only works well when a market is moving sideways.
When a market is trending up strongly, the overbought signal is just going to stay “overbought” for a prolonged time.
The converse is true as well.
So, relying on technical indicators to buy and sell stocks does not seem like sound investing to me.
Personally, I feel that there is too much short-term trading taking place in the portfolio, and I believe in investing in great companies at a discounted price and holding them for the long term.
Let’s look at some “market-timing” trades made in Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio.
As you can see below, they sold Wynn Resort Ltd in Jun 2022 at an absolutely low which is about $55 per share, and took close to a 50% loss on its position.
A few months later (on 30 Dec 2022), Wynn Resort’s share price rose to $82 per share after he sold his position.
You know what?
On 1st June 2023, Jim Cramer bought back some Wynn Resort shares at $98.43 per share.
Again on 10th Nov 2023, he bought some more Wynn Resort shares at $82.39 per share.
Again on 8th Feb 2024, he bought some more Wynn Resort shares at $106.89 per share.
The idea of buying low and selling high and then buying back at a lower price looks very appealing.
Sometimes, it’s possible to guess the market direction right and get back in at a cheaper price.
But, many times, after you’ve sold the stock hoping to get back in at a lower price, the stock could just keep going up and never come down to the price you wanted.
Are you going to buy back at a higher price and hope to sell at an even higher price later?
All the great investors in history did not make their billions by trying to time the market and frequently buying and selling stocks.
Most of the time, they buy a good stock at a fair price and they wait.
Because money is made in the waiting.
The hard truth about trading?
The majority of traders lose money in the long term because no one can predict the short-term price movement of the stock.
So, if you are looking for stock recommendations for long-term growth and appreciation, platforms such as Motley Fool Stock Advisor and Morningstar would be a much better alternative.
Of course, there are also profitable trades made by Jim Cramer.
For example, he trimmed his Eli Lilly position at $591 per share in Sep 2023.
But, months later, Eli Lilly made an all-time high of about $800 per share.
Now, let’s move on to other features of Jim Cramer’s CNBC Investing Club subscription.
There is an “Analysis” section that mainly talks about general stock market trends and also gives the CNBC Investing Club’s take on quarterly earnings from companies whose shares are part of Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust.
However, the so-called analysis of companies is most of the time just a recap of what the CEOs of the companies talked about, a commentary (and also a recap) on the company’s quarterly earnings report, or a collection of comments from various equity analysts that follow the stock.
Basically, I find the “company-specific analysis reports” quite short-term focused and of little actionable insight.
For example, this is an “analysis” report on Abbott Laboratories.
There is another interesting feature inside CNBC Investing Club.
It is called “Bullpen”.
Basically, the bullpen is stocks that they are watching along with the stocks within Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio.
By the way, it’s not a specific buy recommendation with an entry price.
It’s merely opportunities that they find intriguing.
Also, it’s not guaranteed that they would add these stocks to the portfolio because sometimes they will also place in the bullpen stocks that are either too small for the portfolio or carry a lot of risks.
Lastly, CNBC Investing members can join the monthly call with Jim Cramer where you can either watch it on a live video feed on any web browser or dial in to listen.
If you have questions for Jim Cramer, you can submit them in advance for him to answer during the live monthly call.
But, you can ONLY ask him questions regarding the current portfolio holdings or broader macro trends.
Basically, during the live call, Jim Cramer would talk about what has happened in the market and also briefly go through the individual stocks in the portfolio.
To sum up, the biggest selling points of this investment subscription service are Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio and its real-time trade alerts.
Also, you could learn from Jim Cramer about how to analyze stocks and manage a stock portfolio.
So, will it really help you outperform the stock market?
That depends on the track record of Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio as well as the performance of the individual stocks inside the portfolio.
Jim Cramer’s Charitable Trust Portfolio Returns Vs S&P 500
So, what is the past performance of Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio over the years?
Did it manage to beat the market every year?
Now, let’s look at the performance comparison as of April 2024 between Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio and S&P 500 every single year since 2001.
Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio performance | S&P 500 performance | |
8/1/2001 -12/31/2001 | -2.67% | -4.64% |
2002 | -19.79% | -21.97% |
2003 | 34.46% | 28.36% |
2004 | 5.25% | 10.74% |
2005 | 5.19% | 4.83% |
2006 | 7.05% | 15.61% |
2007 | 9.51% | 5.49% |
2008 | -37.67% | -36.55% |
2009 | 31.14% | 25.93% |
2010 | 14.29% | 14.82% |
2011 | -9.58% | 2.1% |
2012 | 16.67% | 15.89% |
2013 | 25.78% | 32.04% |
2014 | 1.33% | 13.52% |
2015 | -2.33% | 1.37% |
2016 | 4.86% | 11.76% |
2017 | 12.66% | 21.6% |
2018 | -9.86% | -4.23% |
2019 | 30.39% | 31.19% |
2020 | 24.95% | 18.05% |
2021 | 27.85% | 28.56% |
2022 | -22.63% | -19.44% |
2023 | 24.52% | 24.23% |
YTD April 2024 | 7.03% | 5.90% |
As you can see from the table, Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio has ONLY narrowly beat the market 7 times out of the 20 years from 2002 to 2023.
Honestly, I am not wowed by this performance.
I mean, you would be much better off just putting your money in S&P 500 index ETFs, and also saving yourself a $399.99/year subscription fee, and also saving yourself a lot of time from making so many trades based on the alerts.
So, if you are looking for a stock picking service for long-term investments with a proven track record of beating the market, I highly recommend that you check out my review of Motley Fool Stock Advisor.
CNBC Investing Club Cost
So, how much does Jim Cramer’s CNBC Investing Club cost?
There are three types of pricing plans:
- Monthly subscription: $49.99/month
- Annual subscription: $33/month (or $399.99/year)
Currently, there is no free trial.
What is their refund policy for CNBC Investing Club?
Once you have made payments, CNBC does not provide refunds or credits for any unused services.
If you don’t intend to renew your subscription, you need to turn off auto-renew on your subscription in the “settings”.
Is the CNBC Investing Club subscription expensive?
Personally, I don’t think it’s worth paying $399.99 per year for it.
Here’s why.
If your investment portfolio is less than $40,000, $399.99/year would be more than 1% per year in fees taken out of your portfolio.
Over time, “a small 1% fee” would add up and significantly reduce your overall returns.
It would ONLY make sense to make such “a high percentage fee” if it can help you outperform the market by a lot.
Why did I say it is a high percentage fee?
This is because Vanguard S&P 500 Index ETF only charges 0.04% a year in fees.
So far, as you can see, Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio has underperformed the S&P 500 index since its inception.
Furthermore, the stock picks in Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolios are NOT for long-term investments, unlike Motley Fool Stock Advisor stock picks.
There are just too many trades (adding to positions, taking profits, or trimming positions) going on to my liking.
For me, I want to buy fundamentally solid stocks with long-term growth potential and hold them for years, and not get affected by the temporary market swings.
By the way, that’s what investment legends Warren Buffet and Charlie Munger do to accumulate their wealth.
Do you see Warren Buffet buy and sell stocks in his portfolios frequently?
Nope.
In fact, he has been holding Coca-Cola for 32 years and still holding it.
That’s why I prefer Motley Fool Stock Advisor to CNBC Investing Club and have been a paying Stock Advisor subscriber for years.
Price-wise, Motley Fool Stock Advisor is only $99/year, which is just a third of what you would pay for CNBC Investing Club.
CNBC Investing Club vs. Motley Fool Stock Advisor
So, what is the key difference between CNBC Investing Club and Motley Fool Stock Advisor?
CNBC Investing Club gives you access to Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio and gives you real-time alerts on any buy or sell trades that are going to happen in its portfolio.
There could be as many as five alerts in one day, so there is much more short-term trading than long-term investing.
On the other hand, Motley Fool Stock Advisor gives specific stock recommendations every month to help you build a stock portfolio for potential long-term growth.
It shows its members what stocks it is recommending, what the recommended purchase price is, and exactly why it might be a good stock for long-term investment together with the potential risks involved with the stock.
Also, there is no need to worry about when to sell because it gives its members a real-time notification about when it thinks it is the right time to sell the stock.
Now, let’s compare Motley Fool Stock Advisor’s performance with that of Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio.
As both investment subscription services started on different dates, it would not be fair to compare their performance directly.
So, we would be using the S&P 500 as a benchmark to measure its performance since its inception.
First, let’s look at the performance comparison between Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio and the S&P 500.
As of 16th Apr 2024 , the returns of Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio are about 247% while the returns of the S&P 500 index are about 328% over the same period.
That means Jim Cramer’s charitable trust portfolio has been underperforming the S&P 500 index since Aug 2001.
First of all, let’s take a look at their track record as of 26 June 2024.
Below is the performance comparison between the Motley Fool Stock Advisor and the S&P 500 between 2002 and 26 June 2024.
As of 26 June 2024, average Motley Fool Stock Advisor recommendations have returned over 756% since inception while the S&P 500 has returned 161%.
In short, the Motley Fool Stock Advisor has outperformed the market 4 to 1.
But, what about its individual stock picks?
Below is a table that shows you the performance of individual stock picks over the years.
As of 6th September 2023, Motley Fool Stock Advisor has had 173 stock recommendations with 100%+ returns.
[Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Individual investment results may vary. All investing involves risk of loss.]
Will the Motley Fool Stock Advisor always be right about their stock recommendations?
No, because no one can be right about their stock picks 100% of the time.
Let me sidetrack a bit here.
If any stock-picking service tells you that they have a close to 100% success rate on their stock picks and can guarantee you high investment returns, you should definitely stay away.
Even Warren Buffet has loss-making stocks in his portfolio, but he still achieves above-average returns because a few big gainers in the portfolio can make up for the under-performers.
What I like about the Motley Fool Stock Advisor is that they are very open and transparent about their bad investments.
As a member, I can see the performance of ALL its past and current stock recommendations (even for closed positions).
Some other stock-picking services that I’ve tried, don’t publish the performance of all their past and current stock recommendations, so it’s not easy for you to find out their past track record.
Personally, I used Motley Fool Stock Advisor to get stock ideas because they have a track record of finding multi-baggers.
For example, it recommended Nvidia back in 2005, then again in 2009, then again in 2017.
It first discovered Netflix back in 2003 and has recommended it multiple times over the years as shown below.
So, I like to use the Motley Fool Stock Advisor as an important source of investment ideas.
I will read their research team’s analysis and then also do my own independent research on platforms such as Seeking Alpha, Stock Rover, and Morningstar before deciding whether or not I want to invest in the stock.
So, if you are thinking of getting into stock investing, I recommend the Motley Fool Stock Advisor because I think there are a lot of well-researched stock recommendations with long-term growth potential.
Lastly, let’s compare the pricing.
So, how much does CNBC Investing Club cost?
Its annual subscription is $399.99/year.
Now, what about Motley Fool Stock Advisor?
Usually, its annual subscription is $199.
Right now, there’s a special limited-time 50% OFF offer* for new members for the first year when you click the link here to try it out for 30 days with a Membership-Fee-Back Guarantee. (*Billed annually. Introductory price for the first year for new members only. First-year bills at $99 and renews at $199)
So, for $99 a year- that’s just $1.80 a week – you can gain unlimited access to their library of expert stock recommendations which are carefully selected to help you grow your wealth.
Limited Time: Claim Your 50% OFF Stock Advisor Introductory Offer For New Members
Mark says
Gladice
Great job exposing the underperformance of Jim Cramer and his fund.
Perhaps the easiest way to compare investing performance is by using “annualized total returns” over specified time periods much the same way Exchange Traded Funds do, for example 1-year, 5-years, 10-years etc. Then the true “alpha” will jump out! I always suspected Jim Cramer was a lot of sizzle and no substance in terms of true outperformance. Thank you for exposing this fraudster! Anyone who charges a fee for investment advise that underperforms the SPX should be exposed.
Bob says
I have benefitted greatly by following Cramer’s recommendations by doing the opposite of what he recommends.
Chad says
The only reason to be in the club is if you want to loss money. Virtually all if his stock picks are down and setting up to go a lot lower. His historical track record is ~67% losers, so tell me why CNBC allows him to continue to rip people off. While I am not surprised that the AI bubble burst, I am surprised at how fast it happened. Most company’s have smoke and mirrors, and those who actually have a product resembles more of a 20 year data mining/analytics product, no where close to generative AI. Chip stocks will continue to get crushed as the demand (artificial) for AI hype come down from stratosphere. He would be smart to short each of his picks or write puts against them. Most people may not know that Cramer was forced to set up a charitable trust to pay restitution for his malfeasant’s while working on wall street. So, it is less of a charity thing, than a regulatory thing, which is why he is no longer allowed to trade on wall street. All of that said, there is some entertainment value especially when he ventures down rat holes like charting, in which he is fumbles his way to explain.
Rick says
This isn’t the first report of Cramer picks underperforming so no surprises here. What I don’t understand is msnbc allowing Cramer to hitch his wagon the way he does in the ads. I wouldn’t want to be associated with his overpriced and underperforming service. Why does msnbc think associating with Cramer is a good thing?
Rick Meyer says
he has no connection to MSNBC, he’s on CNBC
Mark says
Rick….is it msnbc or cnbc?